2026:JHHC:9130 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2636 of 2026 Sanjit Rajwar @ Sajeet Rajwar, aged about 30 years Son of Horen Rajwar, Resident of Village – Chatradih, Sutiarpara, P.O. & P.S. Tinpahar, District - Sahibganj … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Advocate --- 02/01.04.2026 Heard the learned counsels for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2026 in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No.29/2024, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 332, 353, 504, 506, 307 of IPC, now pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M, Rajmahal. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2026 and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R, but the specific allegation of attempt to murder is against Manoj Rajwar, and no specific overt act has been mentioned so far the petitioner is concerned. He has submitted that similarly situated co- accused persons namely Botal Rajwar and Manoj Rajwar have been enlarged on bail by the learned trial court itself and another co- accused namely Mahavir Rajwar has been enlarged on bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No.2639 of 2026. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and submitted that the victim has suffered grievous injury. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail by the trial court and one by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and specific allegation for attempt to murder in the F.I.R. has been made against Manoj Rajwar, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees 2026:JHHC:9130 2 twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M, Rajmahal in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No.29/2024, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:01.04.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:02.04.2026