[2026:RJ-JP:1918] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11124/2020 Kesar Devi Widow Of Late Kajodmal Raigar, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Gangapurcity, Raigar Mohalla, Near Station Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Raj., Through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. District Collector, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 3. Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 4. The Warden, Ambedkar Chhatravas, Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chand Katara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narain Mr. Amitosh Pareek, Dy.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “(i) The respondents may kindly be directed to count seniority from the date of initial appointment (ii) and grant minimum regular pay scale and salary shall be fixed in the regular pay scale from her initial appointment. Arrears to be paid to the petitioners with interest. (iii) The respondent may kindly be directed to calculate the pay scale of the petitioner by [2026:RJ-JP:1918] (2 of 3) [CW-11124/2020] extending revision of pay scale as was admissible to other employees from time to time.” 2. The petitioner has prayed for consideration of his case for regularization of service in light of judgment in case of Dharam Singh and Ors. Vs. State of UP and Anr., order dated 19.08.2025; 2025 INSC 998 and Jaggo Vs. Union of India and Ors.:2024 INSC 1034. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the case of present petitioner be considered in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and Jaggo (supra). 4. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the petitioner may file a representation along with the supportive documents and same shall be considered by the department concerned. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and also the material placed on record, these writ petition may be disposed in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra), and Jaggo (supra). 6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and Jaggo (supra) but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents [2026:RJ-JP:1918] (3 of 3) [CW-11124/2020] are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /99