APHC010103392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 602/2025 Between: 1. KALLURI RAMA KRISHNA, S/O SRINU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O KAMMAPALEM 1ST LANE, ONGOLE TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASH DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KODURI VENKATESHWARA RAO, The Commissioner, Ongole Municipal Corporation Ongole town, Prakasam district. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnor/Respondent no.4 in the W.P No.12393 of 2021for gross, deliberate and willful violation of the final order dated 04.03.2024 in W.P No. 12393 of 2021 on the file of the Honble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK ASIF Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: p. 2 ORDER The above contempt case was filed complaining violation of order dated 04.03.2024 in W.P.No.12393 of 2021. 2. Petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of respondents in not taking steps regarding illegal construction made by the 6th respondent contrary to the Permit No.1035/0155/B/ONG/THPUMLPLM/2020 dated 14.07.2020, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. The writ petition was disposed of directing the Commissioner, Ongole Municipal Corporation to pass appropriate orders, since the authority set the law into motion. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that the respondent failed to adhere to the order in the writ petition. 5. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri A.S.C.Bose, learned counsel for the respondent submitted the proceedings issued by the respondent vide No.BPS2025/PRK/OGL/7/007737, dated 21.01.2026, whereby the unauthorized construction made by the 6th respondent in the writ petition, was regularized. Copy of the said proceedings, are handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any violation of order in the writ petition. 7. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is Dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD