( 2026:JHHC:18785 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5859 of 2026 ------ Md. Aman Ansari @ Aman Ansari, aged about 18 years, son of Md. Mustak Ansari, resident of Riverside, Bhurkunda, P.O. & P.S.-Patratu, Dist.-Ramgarh … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 29.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.78 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(2)(b)/111(4)/61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 25(6)/26/35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in an organized crime and in criminal conspiracy with the co- accused persons was bent upon collecting levy from the contractor involved in construction of an over bridge. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –18 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 07 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on suspicion, only because the petitioner was in the car which met with an accident; from which arms were recovered. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 18.06.2026 in B.A. No.5420 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Ramgarh, in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.78 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 29.06.2026 Gunjan-