COCP-1890 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 Mohit Gupta Jyoti Yadav CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. violation of order dated co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM Gupta vs. directed to decide the representation moved by the petitioner by passing a speaking order within a period of certified copy of the said order. 2. Police Station Cyber Crime, Bathinda, learned counsel for the respondent submits that Speaking Order dated which was duly conveyed to the petitioner by way of text message on his mobile No. 95582 petition. 1890-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Mohit Gupta Versus Jyoti Yadav CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rahul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been filed violation of order dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M vs. State of Punjab and others’ directed to decide the representation moved by the petitioner by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date certified copy of the said order. At the very outset, on instructions from ASI Jagdeep Police Station Cyber Crime, Bathinda, learned counsel for the respondent that in compliance of the order dated Speaking Order dated 24.02.2026 has been passed by the which was duly conveyed to the petitioner by way of text message on his mobile No. 95582-00000. As such, nothing IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1890-2026 Date of Decision: 23.04.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rahul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a M-7259-2026, titled as ‘ Mohit whereby the respondent was directed to decide the representation moved by the petitioner by passing a 15 days from the date of receipt of on instructions from ASI Jagdeep Singh, Police Station Cyber Crime, Bathinda, learned counsel for the respondent in compliance of the order dated 09.02.2026(Annexure P-1), 2026 has been passed by the respondent which was duly conveyed to the petitioner by way of text message on his As such, nothing survives in the present alleging a Mohit the respondent was directed to decide the representation moved by the petitioner by passing a receipt of Singh, Police Station Cyber Crime, Bathinda, learned counsel for the respondent respondent which was duly conveyed to the petitioner by way of text message on his survives in the present RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.24 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1890 3. Court by learned counsel for the respon thereof, has also been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. 5. required to be passed in the present petition of, accordingly. 6. Speaking O 7. 8. 23.04.2026 rishu 1890-2026 -2- Copy of Speaking Order dated Court by learned counsel for the respondent is taken on record. A copy thereof, has also been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioners. Heard. In view of the facts noted required to be passed in the present petition accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Order dated 24.02.2026, in accordance with law Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Copy of Speaking Order dated 24.02.2026 handed over in dent is taken on record. A copy thereof, has also been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioners. above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition; and the same stands disposed The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , in accordance with law, if so advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No handed over in dent is taken on record. A copy above, no further orders are disposed The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.24 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.