Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18109 (HP)

AMAR CHAND v. LEKH RAM

CRMPM/1054/2026 · 2026-07-30

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Amar Chand vs. Lekh Ram Cr. MP(M) No. 1054 of 2026 30.7.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Surjeet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP(M) No. 1054 of 2026 Learned counsel for the respondent submits, under instructions that he has no objection to allow the application. In view of this statement, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision (ST) No. 4387 of 12026 Vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 1054 of 2026, the delay in filing the revision has been condoned. It be registered. Mr. Surjeet Verma, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Copy of the revision has been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent. Records be called for. List the matter after four weeks. Cr.MP(ST) No. 4388 of 2026 Notice in the aforesaid terms. Application be registered. Reply, as prayed, be filed within two weeks and list the same along with the main matter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 30th July, 2026 (Chander)