Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18109 (BOM)

M/S NICE INDUSTRIES THROU. NAKUL KANTILAL SHAH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. THE SEC. MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS DEPT AND ORS

WP/13510/2026 · 2026-10-12

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

41.WP.13510.2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13510 OF 2026 M/s Nice Industries ...Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra & Ors ....Respondents Adv. Rahul M. More a/w Adv. Chhangur Chauhan for Petitioner Mrs. P. P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w. Mrs. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C.: 1. Mentioned out of turn. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner at the outset placed reliance on the Order passed by this Court on 7th October, 2026 in Writ Petition No. 13158 of 2026 (M/s. Progressive Surface Systems Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.) and asked for parity. 3. Per contra, learned Addl. GP has placed on record an Order dated 28th September, 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority and submits that there is no urgency as the Appellate Authority has already passed an Order rejecting the Stay Application of the Petitioner and the parallel proceedings would not be permitted. AKN 1 ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2026.10.13 11:06:12 +0530 41.WP.13510.2026.doc 4. In these circumstances, we find no reason to entertain the instant Writ Petition as the Stay Application of the Petitioner is already rejected by the Appellate Authority. Be that as it may, the Appeal of the Petitioner be decided in accordance with law, an expeditiously as possible. 5. The Writ Petition is Disposed Of in light of the above observations/directions. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] AKN 2