VIKAS BHARAT NIKAM v. 1 SHRI SURESH RAMTEKE PRESENTLY OFFICIATING AS MEMBER SECRETARY
CP/682/2026 · 2026-10-09
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18106 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18106 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
926 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 682 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 926 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 682 OF 2026 IN CP/359/2026 Vikas Bharat Nikam Versus Suresh Ramteke And Another __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Ganesh Jyotiram Kore for the Petitioner • Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for State • Adv. Yadav Nandkishor U. for Respondent No. 2 (Standing Counsel) __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 09, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Learned AGP has placed on record order dated 04.09.2026, mentioning that the tribe claim of the petitioner is decided and ultimately invalidated. 2) In view of the same, direction as per the order under contempt has been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48497-DB