SONU YADAV ALIAS VIVEK KR. YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3245/2026 · 2026-06-24
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18105 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18105 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:18465 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3245 of 2026
------ Sonu Yadav @ Vivek Kr. Yadav, aged about 19 years, son of Vijay Kumar Yadav, R/o Bari Sitla Mandir, Banpar Tolla, PO and PS- Sahibganj (T), District- Sahibganj.
.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar , Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha , A.P.P.
------
02/24.06.2026. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nagar (Sahibganj) P.S. Case No.100 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 109 (2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned CJM, Sahibganj.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused and the allegation of firing is there against one Karan Yadav.
4. He next submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para-22 of the instant petition and further one co- accused, Raja Kumar Tanti has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Hon’ble Court vide ABA No.1134 of 2026.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submit that name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused.
6. Considering name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and further, one co-accused in identical situation has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABA, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
2026:JHHC:18465 2
7. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to the learned Trial Court and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Sahibganj, in connection with Nagar (Sahibganj) P.S. Case No.100 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7.
[Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.]of re
24.06.2026. Sandeep/ Uploaded/
8.
a. of this order before the learned Trial Court and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C. J. M.., Sandeep/
Uploaded/