[2026:RJ-JP:411] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8112/2025 1. Rohitash S/o Indraj, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Lujota, Police Station Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh, Hariyana ( Presently Accused Petitioner Is In District Jail At Sikar (Raj.) 2. Ajeet @ Kalu S/o Ramfal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bhedanti, Police Station Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh, Hariyana ( Presently Accused Petitioner Is In District Jail At Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.238/2024 registered at Police Station Patan (Sikar), District-Neem Ka Thana for offences under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 326(g), 324(5), 351(2), 331(5) and 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. The bail application of petitioner no.1-Rohitash has already been allowed by this Court on 28.07.2025. Therefore, by this order bail application of petitioner no.2 is being disposed of. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. According to the criminal [2026:RJ-JP:411] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8112/2025] record 19 criminal cases are pending against the present- petitioner-Ajeet @ Kalu out of which in two cases, he has been acquitted and in rest of the cases he has been bailed out. Co- accused-Rohitash and Ramsingh have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 28.07.2025. No injury has been caused to any person. He further submits that none of weapon has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The allegation comes out from the contents of the FIR is to cause fire in the cabin of the complainant. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 28.02.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Ajeet @ Kalu S/o Ramfal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. [2026:RJ-JP:411] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8112/2025] 8. Further, petitioner is directed to mark his presence fortnightly in every month for a period of six months before the SHO-Patan (Sikar), District Neem Ka Thana. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the Court and petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/1