Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18102 (AP)

Lalam Patrinaidu v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/4522/2018 · 2026-02-05

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010102242018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4522/2018 Between: 1. LALAM PATRINAIDU, S/O SRI LALAM PATRI NAIDU, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.39-8-65/1(2), SECTOR-8, MURALINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPTNAM-16. 3. THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR, DWARAKANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM- 16. 4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VISAKHAPTNAM-1. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction particulary one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the 3rd and 4th Respondent to receive and register the mortgage by deposit of title deed in favour of State Bank of India in respect of house Plot No. 4B comprises of 300 Square Yards or 250.84 square meters in Sy.No.49/1B, Madhavadhara Village of Visakhapatnam and return the same on being registered, by directing the respondents to delete Plot No. 4B comprises of 300 Square Yards or 250.84 square meters in 2 Sy.No.49/1B, Madhavadhara Village of Visakhapatnam from prohibited list of registered properties as per communication vide Lr. RTI No.30/SRO.DWK/2017 dt. 30-12-2017 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th Respondent to receive and register the mortgage by deposit of title deed in favour of State Bank of India in respect of house Plot No. 4B comprises of 300 Square Yards or 250.84 square meters in Sy.No.49/1B, Madhavadhara Village of Visakhapatnam and return the same on being registered pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 2. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3 it was stated that the petitioner, without presenting any document for registration, has straightaway approached this Court. 3. Therefore, without going into merits of the case, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file all the relevant documents before the respondent authorities for registration. If such documents are filed before the authorities, the respondents shall consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS 4 338 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4522/2018 Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS