Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18100 (BOM)

ANUSHOOL METALS PVT. LTD. v. JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD. PUNE AND ORS

WP/10324/2024 · 2026-10-12

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

7-WP.10324.2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10324 OF 2024 Anushool Metals Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. Pune and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Kishor Patil with Mr. Dipak Mane, Ms. Akshada Nagrale and Mr. Anish Kikle i/b Thodur Law Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. Benny Joseph with Mr. Abu U. Shaikh, Mr. Riyan Jijina and Mr. Siiddhesh Kini i/b BJ Law Offices LLP for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Nitin Gaware Patil with Mr. Shivkumar S. Jangwad and Ms. Aakanksha Jamadar for the Respondent No.3. Ms. Kavita Solunke, Addl.G.P. with Mr. M. M. Pable, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 12th OCTOBER 2026 P.C. : 1. When we expressed our disinclination to entertain the writ petition, principally on two grounds, namely, the delay and the fact that the order dated 14th June 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge, holding that the Revision could not have been entertained by the authority, does not furnish a fresh cause of action to the petitioner, the N. S. Chitnis 1/2 NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2026.10.13 15:17:40 +0530 7-WP.10324.2024.doc learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. While considering the request, we make it clear that whatever remedy may be available to the petitioner, definitely it shall not be before us. ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J. BHARATI DANGRE, J. N. S. Chitnis 2/2