Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010276112025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/164/2026 DR NANI GOPAL GOSWAMI AND ORS FORMER MEMBER ASCPCR S/O LATE NARENDRA NATH GOSWAMI R/O HOUSE NO. 2 GHARMARA SATRA PATH GEETANAGAR P.S. NOONMATI GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN 781020 2: SRI RAJESWAR SARMA FORMER MEMBER ASCPCR S/O LATE MANIK CHANDRA SARMA R.O- HOUSE NO -46 P.O -KHARGULI DR BHUPEN HAZARIKA ROAD P.O- LATASIL GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENRTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 Page No.# 2/3 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM ASSAM WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 4:THE LEGAL REMEMBRANCE AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT E-BLOCK 2ND FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF ASSAM MAIDAM GAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781028. 6:THE DIRECTOR OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI 781001. 7:THE CHAIRPERSON ASSAM STATE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS BYE LANE - I HOUSE NO - 3 SAMANNOY PATH SURVEY BASISTHA ROAD GUWAHATI- 781028 8:THE SECRETARY ASSAM STATE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS BYE LANE - I HOUSE NO 3 SAMANNOY PATH SURVEY Page No.# 3/3 BASISTHA ROAD GUWAHATI 781028 ------------ Advocate for : MR. P K ROY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 30.01.2026 Heard Mr P K Roy, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr S K Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr S K Medhi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General. 2. The present interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioner stating that due to an inadvertence, a specific challenge to the impugned order dated 15.10.2025 remained to be incorporated, although specific averments pointing out illegalities in the same orders have been incorporated in the writ petition. 3. The learned Senior Counsel for the applicants prays that the applicants may be allowed to file an amended writ petition, incorporating the said prayer leaving the rest of the writ petition without being amended or affected. 4. The prayer so made not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents is allowed. 4. The applicants are allowed to file the amended writ petition, incorporating the challenge to the order dated 15.10.2025, without carrying any other modification or alteration in the writ petition. 5. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant