IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10035 of 2026 Decided on 30th July, 2026 Sunil Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Vishwa Bhushan and Anuja Mehta, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) This case has been listed on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be in the interest of justice, in case, he is permitted to file a fresh representation with regard to the issues raised in this petition to the Authority and the same be ordered to be decided within some reasonable time. 3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a fresh representation with regard to the issue raised in this petition to the competent Authority within a period of four weeks from today, let the same be decided in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks thereafter, in view of the averments made therein as well as judgments, if any, being relied upon by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 30, 2026 (vinod)