Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18095 (PAT)

Kavita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./38204/2026 · 2026-06-16

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38204 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2026 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== Kavita Kumari Wife of Shashi Bind, D/o Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Bind Resident of Village- Beda Mod, Banarasiya, P.S.- Sasaram (Muffasil), District- Rohtas, Permanent Address- Wife of Shashi Bind, Resident of Village- Darangiya, P.S.- Shivsagar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 123 of 2026 instituted under Sections 8(c)/ 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, 124 gms of brown sugar was recovered from three persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused, who has stated that petitioner is also involved in the crime. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38204 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/2 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the fact that the name of the petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused who was apprehended on the spot and also judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana vs. Samarth Kumar reported as 2022 SCC OnLine SC 2087, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. 8. The petitioner may surrender and pray for regular bail before the Court below. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T