Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18094 (CAL)

PARIMAL ROY v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS

WPA/2253/2025 · 2026-01-09

Shampa Sarkar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No.76 09.01.2026 Court. No. 2 (gc) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE JURISDICTION WPA 2253 of 2025 Sri Parimal Roy VS Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) & Ors. Mr. Jagriti Mishra, Ms. Mrinmayee Das … for the Petitioner. Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mr. Mayank Bhandari, Mr. Ved Rai, Mr. Vivek Saha, Mr. Binayak Bandopadhyay … for the BPCL. 1. The affidavit-of-service is taken on record. 2. The writ petition is not maintainable in view of the alternative forum. The dispute resolution clause contains an arbitration agreement. It also appears that pre-arbitration mechanism has been provided in the agreement entered into between the parties. 3. Under such circumstances, the petitioner is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. 5. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 6. The parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)