Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1809 (GAU)

PUSHPENDRA HAZARIKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./128/2026 · 2026-03-08

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010281582025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./128/2026 PUSHPENDRA HAZARIKA S/O SRI MRIGEN HAZARIKA R/O PANICHOKUA DERKURIA GAON, PO- PANICHOKUA, PS- PULIBOR, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785006. 2: BHREEGU HAZARIKA PANICHOKUA DERKURIA GAON PO- PANICHOKUA PS- PULIBO VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:BHREEGU HAZARIKA SON OF SRI PUSHPENDRA HAZARIKA R/O PANICHOKUA DERKURIA GAON PO- PANICHOKUA PS- PULIBOR DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN-785006 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R PHUKAN, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Page No.# 2/2 Date : 09.03.2026 Heard Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. The trial Court record has been received and perused. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer for bail of atleast the petitioner No.2, who is a student may be considered at this stge. I have gone through the records. Going by the nature of evidence and the progress of the trial and the number of witnesses, who remain to be examined, this Court does not find it a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner at this stge. Bail Application of both the petitioners is hereby rejected at this stage. Bail Application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant