MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH AND 3 OTHERS v. MOHAMMAD UMAR AND 4 OTHERS
A227/6184/2026 · 2026-05-04
Vikas Budhwar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1809 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1809 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6184 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard.
2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents.
3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition is for a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), New Court II, Shahganj, Jaunpur to finally decide the application dated 23.07.2024 under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. in Suit No. 771 of 2024 (Mohd. Abdullah and others Vs. Mohd. Umar and others pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), New Court II, Shahganj, Jaunpur within a reasonable time frame as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court or on the next date fixed in the matter..
4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), New Court II, Shahganj, Jaunpur to finally decide the application dated 23.07.2024 under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. in Suit No. 771 of 2024 (Mohd. Abdullah and others Vs. Mohd. Umar and others, expeditiously, preferably within eight months, strictly in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments, subject to legal impediment. May 5, 2026 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nikhil Kumar Yadav, Vagish Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Vikas Budhwar,J.) Mohammad Abdullah And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Mohammad Umar And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad