Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18089 (BOM)

NIRMALA DEVI SHYAMRESH PAL ALIAS NIRMALA DEVI JANTU PAL AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. MINISTRY AND ORS

IA/5907/2026 · 2026-10-12

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17-IA5907-2026.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5907 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13919 OF 2025 Mrs. Nirmala Devi Shyamresh Pal & Ors. ...Applicants/ Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents Mr. Vinod Singh, for the Applicants/Petitioners. Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, AGP for the State. Mr. Arjun Yadav, i/b Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal and R. S. Justicia, for the SRA. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 12th OCTOBER, 2026 PC:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants. 2. This is an application for amendment in the petition so as to bring the subsequent events on record and seek the relief of restoration of the subject premises as the applicants – petitioners claim that they have been dispossessed during the pendency of the petition. 3. As the Court is required to take conscious cognizance of the subsequent events and mould the relief, in the event the 1/2 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.10.13 11:58:19 +0530 17-IA5907-2026.DOC petitioners succeed in the petition, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. Necessary amendment in accordance with the schedule of the amendment (Exhibit-D) be carried out and amended copy of the petition be served on the respondents within a period of one week. 5. The respondents are at liberty to file an affidavit-in-reply to deal with the averments in the amended petition within a period of two weeks thereafter. 6. Writ Petition stand over to 30th November, 2026. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2