Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18073 (CAL)

RAM PRASAD BAOYALI @ RAM PRASAD BAWALI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/9/2026 · 2026-02-13

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

February 13, 2026 49 ARDR IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (M) 9 of 2026 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mal Police Station Case No. 410 of 2025 dated 3/9/2025 under Sections 85/103(1)/3(5) of the BNS. And In Re : Ram Prasad Baoyali @ Ram Prasad Bawali ... Petitioner Adv. Anirban Banerjee, ... for the Petitioner. Adv. Ujjwal Luksom, Adv. Dhiman Sil, ..for the State. The petitioner is in custody for more than 100 days and prays for bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s wife was murdered and he has no nexus with the alleged incident. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record. The petitioner is the husband of the victim who was murdered. The victim was residing with the petitioner in the house where she was found murdered. The petitioner owes an explanation under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam with regard to the circumstances leading to the said incident. The offending weapon has been recovered at the instance of the petitioner. Charge sheet has been submitted. Trial is yet to commence. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. CRM (M) 9 of 2026 is disposed of. 2 Case Diary be returned. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)