[2026:RJ-JP:2474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 634/2025 Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phoole University, Sp 2 And 3, Kant Kalwar, Riico Industrial Area, Tala Mod, Nh-8 Achrol Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Shri Devrai Nanjundiah Naresh, S/o Shri D.n. Nanjundiah, Aged About 52 Years Working On The Post Of Registrar, Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phoole University, Sp 2 And 3, Kant Kalwar, Riico Industrial Area, Tala Mod, Nh-8, Achrol Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Shri Bachanesh Kumar Agarwal, Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Mr. Omprakash Rahar, Deputy Director (Scholarship), Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat with Mr. Anirudh Sharma for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of order passed by this Court, after following the [2026:RJ-JP:2474] (2 of 2) [CCP-634/2025] procedure, fresh order has been passed, hence, no contempt is made out. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner although admits that order has been passed, yet has raised objection with regard to procedure followed by the respondents while passing the fresh order. 3. In the light of above, where, in compliance of order passed by this Court, fresh order has been passed by the respondents, no case for deliberate and willful non-compliance is made out. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed. 4. Notices stand discharged. 5. However, dismissal of this contempt petition would not prejudice right of the petitioner to challenge the fresh order and he would be at liberty to do so. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /26