[2026:RJ-JP:1350] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10344/2019 Pooranmal Meena S/o Gopiram Meena, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Gudha Bhoda Ki Dhani, Bassi Chak, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Rural De- velopment And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Yaduvanshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saurabh Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/01/2026 1 The instant writ petition is preferred by the petitioner with the contention that he is working on daily wages basis/ad- hoc basis/contractual basis or any other form but not in the capacity of substantive or permanent employee. 2 The petitioner has prayed for consideration of his case for regularization of service in light of judgment in case of Dharam Singh and Ors. Vs. State of UP and Anr., order dated 19.08.2025; 2025 INSC 998 and Jaggo Vs. Union of India and Ors.:2024 INSC 1034. 3 Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to ac- [2026:RJ-JP:1350] (2 of 3) [CW-10344/2019] cept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: (I) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to give equal salary to equal work and pay due allowances to the petitioner. (ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby directs the respondents to reg- ularize the petitioner on the post of Class IVth Em- ployee. iii. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to give equal work equal pay to the petitioners similarly given by this Honble Court in the case of Suman Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Peti- tion No.14313/2017 vide order dated 24.08.2017. iv. Pass any other appropriate order which this Honible Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. v. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner. 4 Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the case of present petitioner be considered in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and Jaggo (supra). 5 Learned counsel for respondent submits that the petitioner may file a representation along with the supportive docu- ments and same shall be considered by the department con- cerned. 6 Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and also the material placed on record, instant writ [2026:RJ-JP:1350] (3 of 3) [CW-10344/2019] petitions may be disposed of in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra), and Jaggo (supra). 7 Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respon- dents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and Jaggo (supra) but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to commu- nicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /18