$~129 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010408332026 + W.P.(C) 12633/2026 & CM APPL. 58548/2026 BACHAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta and Ms. Lavanya Bhardwaj, Advocates with petitioner in person Mob: 9811046710 versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate for R- AIIMS Mob: 9891205519 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 07.09.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it was recorded in the last order dated 01st September, 2026, passed by this Court that she herself had appeared before the present Presiding Officer of the Rouse Avenue Court and conducted cross-examination, in the presence of the Court staff, while the said Presiding Officer was sitting inside his chamber. 2. She submits that aforesaid statement may be modified to record that she had appeared before the previous bench of Rouse Avenue Court and had conducted cross examination in the presence of staff members, while the Presiding Officer was not present in the Court. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:10:36 3. The aforesaid statement is taken note of. 4. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks to set aside the order dated 03rd October, 2025, passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-1 (“CGIT”), Delhi in ID 75/2016 and three other connected industrial disputes, whereby, fresh notice was issued to the respondents. 5. It is submitted that the respondents were proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 09th July, 2018, and all the evidence and arguments were concluded while the proceedings remained ex-parte. 6. After hearing the parties, this Court is of the view that it is for the said CGIT to decide as to whether or not notice should be issued to any party, and the assistance which the CGIT requires from such a party. 7. This Court would not go into such issues. 8. At this stage, learned counsel appearing of the petitioner submits that the aforesaid case has been pending before the CGIT for a long time, and requests for the same to be decided expeditiously. 9. Accordingly, the CGIT is requested to expedite the disposal of the aforesaid industrial dispute, i.e., ID 75/2016. 10. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. 11. Pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 7, 2026 ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:10:36