SIMRANJEET SINGH BHAMRAH AND ORS v. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
W.P.(CRL)/2838/2026 · 2026-09-15
Saurabh Banerjee
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18064 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18064 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010436032026 + W.P.(CRL) 2838/2026
SIMRANJEET SINGH BHAMRAH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Prachi, Adv. with petitioners in person
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC for the State with ASI Virender Kumar, PS.: Ranhola Delhi Mr. Deepak Isar, Adv. for R-2 (through VC) with R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R %
15.09.2026 CRL.M.A. 28530/2026 (for condonation of delay of 13 days in re-filing)
1. By virtue of the present application, the petitioners seek condonation of a delay of 13 days in re-filing the captioned petition.
2. For the reasons stated in the present application, the same is allowed and the delay of 13 days in re-filing the captioned petition is condoned.
3. As such, the application is disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 2838/2026
4. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No.488/2022 dated 22.07.2022 registered at PS.: Rajouri Garden This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:13:30
under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Mediation Settlement dated 04.09.2025 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi (Annexure B), whereby the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 have mutually resolved their disputes.
5. Issue notice.
6. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.
7.
Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed. 8. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioners as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Mediation Settlement dated 04.09.2025, in furtherance whereof, out of total settlement amount of Rs.15,00,000/-, the petitioner no.1 has already paid her the settlement amount of Rs.11,25,000/- and the remaining sum of Rs.3,75,000/- has been paid to her by way of a Demand Draft being DD No.918731 dated 10.07.2026 drawn on Punjab & Sind Bank as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. They submit that the marriage inter se the respondent no.2 and petitioner no.1 has since been dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 vide Deed of pronouncement of Divorce dated 07.05.2026, and as such, the parties have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent no.2 hence submits that she does not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:13:30
9. The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials as on record, have been identified by the Investigating Officer. 10. As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, as also following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility. 11.
Therefore, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.488/2022 dated 22.07.2022 registered at PS.: Rajouri Garden under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC as also all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 12. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2026/bh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:13:30