UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY v. SHRI KULDEEP RANKA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
CCP/633/2025 · 2026-01-20
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18061 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18061 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2473] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 633/2025 University Of Technology, Fatehpura Road, Kumariyawas Vatika, Jaipur, Through Registrar, Dr. Anoop Sharma S/o Manohar Lal, R/o Guest House, University Campus, University Of Technology, Fatehpura Road, Kumariyawas, Vatika, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justive And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Shri Bachanesh Kumar Agarwal, Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowernment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Mr. Omprakash Rahar, Deputy Director (Scholarship), Department Of Social Justice And Empowernment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Stat Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowernment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat with Mr. Anirudh Sharma for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 20/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of order passed by this Court, after following the procedure, fresh order has been passed, hence, no contempt is made out.
[2026:RJ-JP:2473] (2 of 2) [CCP-633/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner although admits that
order has been passed, yet has raised objection with regard to procedure followed by the respondents while passing the fresh
order.
3. In the light of above, where, in compliance of order passed by this Court, fresh order has been passed by the respondents, no case for deliberate and willful non-compliance is made out. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed.
4. Notices stand discharged.
5. However, dismissal of this contempt petition would not prejudice right of the petitioner to challenge the fresh order and he would be at liberty to do so.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /25