2026:JHHC:17929-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 532 of 2026 ------ Agarwal Infra-ARCON-JV, a joint venture partnership firm, having its office Aishwarya Chambers, Telibandha, P.O. and P.S. – Teliabandha, District:- Raipur, through its authorized Signatory Shree Niwas Pandey, aged about 51, son of Uma Kant Pandey, Near Shiv Mandir (Honda Workshop), Panki Road, Baralota, P.O. & P.S.-Baralota, District:- Daltonganj, Palamu, Jharkhand ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Alka Tiwari, wife of not known, the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Sri Sunil Kumar, son of Not known, the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Sri Sanjay Kujur, son of not known, The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Sri Pradeep Kumar, son of not known, The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Garhwa, P.O. and P.S.- Garhwa, District-Garhwa. 6. Manohar Kumar, son of not known, (Presently In-Charge) Superintendent Engineer, Road Constuction Department, Road Division, Garhwa, P.O. and P.S.-Garhwa, District-Garhwa. ... Opp. Parties CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate : Mrs. Shweta Suman, Advocate : Ms. Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Aditya Kumar, AC to Sr.S.C.-I ------ 2026:JHHC:17929-DB 02/Dated: 19th June, 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the order passed by this Court on 16.07.2024, which is the subject matter of the present contempt case, the reasoned order has been passed. 2. Further, she has submitted that the contempt case may be closed, however, with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum. 3. Regarding the same, there is no opposition by the learned counsel for the concerned opposite party. 4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt case being Cont. Case (Civil) No. 532 of 2026 stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Sanjay Prasad, J.) 19th June, 2026 Samarth Uploaded on 29.06.2026