SHIPRA ALIAS SIPRA DAS v. MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
I.A.(Civil)/282/2026 · 2026-02-05
Susmita Phukan Khaund
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1806 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1806 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010021212026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/282/2026 SHIPRA ALIAS SIPRA DAS WO SRI MITHUN DAS, RO VILL GANDHINAGAR, PO NETAJI NAGAR, PS RAMKRISHNANAGAR, DIST KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN 788116, PRESENT ADDRESS CO SRI SADHAN DAS, SO SRI NAGENDRA DAS, RO VILL CHOTO DUDHPATIL , PS SILCHAR, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788001 VERSUS MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MAGMA HOUSE NO. 24, PARK STREET, KOLKATA-700016 AND A REGIONAL OFFICE AT BLOCK 3B, B201- 202 ECOSPACE BUSINESS PARK, AMBUJA REALITY CAMPUS, ACTION AREA 110, NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANA, WEST BENGAL AND BRANCH OFFICE AT F-FORT BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, SOUTH SARANIA, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-781007.
2:BURHAN UDDIN BARBHUIYA SO MD ABDUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA RO VILL CHANDPUR PO CHANDPUR PS HAILAKANDI DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN 788151 3:KAMRUL ISLAM BARBHUIYA SO MD ATAUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA RO VILL CHANDPUR PO CHANDPUR PS HAILAKANDI DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 PIN 788151 4:JAYANTA DEB SO SRI JAGADISH DEB RO VILL GAMARIA PO GAMARIA PS RK NAGAR DIST KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN 788156 5:SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD BR ARCADE 3RD FLOOR 21 JANAPATH ULUBARI OPPOSITE HOTEL PRIYA PALACE GUWAHATI 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M TALUKDAR, MS. B SARMAH Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R GOSWAMI,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER Date : 06.02.2026
1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. M.Talukdar for the applicants/claimants and
learned counsel Mr. R.Goswami for the opposite parties.
2. The learned Counsel for the applicants has prayed for withdrawal of the amount of Rs.7,36,056/- deposited by the insurance company before the Registry of this Court.
3. The learned counsel for the insurance company has no objection to release the amount in favour of the claimants.
4. I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.
Page No.# 3/3
5. Considering all the aspects, the claimants are allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.7,36,056/- deposited by the insurance company before the Registry of this Court who may allow withdrawal of the amount after proper verification.
6. In terms of the above observation, the interlocutory application stands
disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant