906-ABA-2247-2026.doc Rohit Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2247 OF 2026 Sagar Rajendra Bire and Anr. ...Applicants VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Sachin Deokar, for Applicants. Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Kshama Vitthal Bhambre, Warje Malwadi Police Station, Pune City. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 11 AUGUST 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Deokar, learned counsel appearing for Applicants and Ms. Yadav, learned APP, for Respondent-State. 2. At the outset, Ms. Yadav, learned APP for Respondent-State states that following antecedents are not disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application: 1. 6051/2014 मुंबई दारुबंदी कलम ६५ (ई ) 2. 04/2016 राज्य उत्पादन शुल्क - मुंबई दारुबंदी कलम ६५ (ड) 3. 106/2017 महाराष्ट्र प्रोव्हिहबीशन ऍक्ट कलम ६५ ( ख ) 3. In view of the said contentions raised by learned APP, Mr. Deokar, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh application by disclosing details of all the antecedents. 906-ABA-2247-2026.doc Rohit Ghuge 4. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with the liberty as sought. 5. It is clarified that this court has not considered the merits. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]