RAM PRAVESH BHUIYAN ALIAS RAM PRAVESH BHUIAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5807/2026 · 2026-06-25
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18057 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18057 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:18690] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5807 of 2026
------ Ram Pravesh Bhuiyan @ Ram Pravesh Bhuian, aged about 33 years, son of Mundrika Bhuiyan, R/o Ward 8, Village + P.O. Tatidiri, P.S. Dhurki, Distt. Garhwa (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Yash Raj Gupta, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-25-06-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 467, 468, 420, 406, 407, 408 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has lured the innocent and illiterate villagers and obtained the thumb impression of the informant and the other witnesses and he withdrew money from their accounts and transferred the amount to his own account and fled away. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 23 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-24 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Nagar Untari at Garhwa in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-25.06.2026-Animesh/