Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18052 (HP)

VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CRMPM/1298/2026 · 2026-07-30

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP (M) No.1298 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.07.2026 _______________________________________________________ Vijay Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. SI/SHO Raghujit Singh, P.S. Khundian P.D. Dehra, Distt. Kangra, H.P present in person.[[ ___________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Respondent-State has filed status report and SI/SHO Raghujit Singh, P.S. Khundian P.D. Dehra, Distt. Kangra, H.P has come present with the record. Record perused and returned. 2. Having carefully perused the status report, learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of . (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 30, 2026 (meera) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?