Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18051 (CHH)

SMT. LALITA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3603/2020 · 2026-02-26

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:10248 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3603 of 2020 1. Smt. Lalita Sahu W/o Shri Kaleshwar Sahu, Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Sipahi, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Kavita W/o Dayaram Sahu, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Dabo, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 3. Smt. Danteshwari W/o Tikaram Sahu, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Donda, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 4. Ku. Ranjeeta Dahire D/o Shri Chhailkumar Dahire, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kolihadih, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. … Petitioners versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Woman And Child Welfare And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Collector Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Date: 2026.02.27 16:05:49 +0530 2 5. Project Officer, Woman And Child Development Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners :- Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate. For State :- Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Panel Lawyer. SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 27.02.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that she has no instruction on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute the instant writ petition. 2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit