Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18048 (BOM)

MOHAMMAD RASHID KAMAL @ KAMAL RASHID KHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

WP/1511/2026 · 2026-10-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

42-WP-1511-26..DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1511 OF 2026 Mohammad Rashid Kamal @ Kamal Rashid Khan …Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. …Respondents Adv. Taraq Sayed a/w Adv. Jinay Jain i/b SRK legal, for the Petitioner Ms. M.R. Tidke, for Respondent-State. Mr. Dipak Thorat, PSI,Oshiwara Police Station, Mumbai. Mr. Sajog Amrithar, Versova Police Station, Mumbai. CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 13th October, 2026 PC:- 1. Heard Mr. Sayed, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Ms. Tidke, learned APP for the Respondent State . 2. In this Writ Petition, the challenge is to the Notice dated 4th February, 2026 issued by the Respondent No.2 – Deputy Commissioner of Police. 3. Ms. Tidke, learned APP for the Respondent-State, submits that the order has been passed under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, Page 1 Aftab S. 42-WP-1511-26..DOC 1956 externing the Petitioner for a period of 2 years. She submits that there is a remedy of Statutory Appeal to challenge the said order under section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act. 4. In view of the said subsequent development, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. 6. All contentions of both the parties are expressly kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Aftab S.