1 / 2 2026:CGHC:9972 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2032 of 2026 1 - Munna Lal Bojje S/o Shri Chhaviraj Aged About 62 Years Retired Sthal Sahayak, At Executive Engineer Public Works Department Pathalgaon , Division Pathalgaon, District- Jashpur (C.G.) R/o Near Rest House, Raigarh Road Pathalgaon Tahsil Pathalgaon, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Aashmati W/o Shri Pahdev Aged About 64 Years Retired Gang, Shramik Akushal At Executive Engineer Public Works Department Pathalgaon , Division Pathalgaon, District- Jashpur (C.G.) R/o Village Charkhapara (Bakaruma) Tahsil Dharamjaigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department, Public Works Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief Department Of Public Works Nirman Bhawan, North Block Naya Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department Pathalgaon, Division Pathalgaon District- Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - Joint Director, Treasury Account And Pension Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Siddhant Sharma, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 26/02/2026 2 / 2 1. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees, is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioners. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners therein have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioners may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioners expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioners are not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioners, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration, the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioners to submit fresh representations. In the event, petitioners submits representation, their claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Saurabh JUDGE