Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18046 (JHR)

HAMID ANASRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3302/2026 · 2026-06-25

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18685 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3302 of 2026 Hamid Ansari, aged about 34 years, son of late Nijamuddin Ansari, resident of village Bangarhi, P.O.and P.S. Fatehpur, District-Jamtara ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. 02/ 25.06.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025, registered under sections 111(2)(b), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and section 66(B) (C) (D) of the Information Technology Act and under section 42(3) (e) of Communication Act, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has earlier moved before this Court in A.B.A. No.713 of 2026 which was withdrawn by order dated 24.02.2026 with liberty to move before the learned Court. He further submits that on the fresh ground second anticipatory bail has been filed and in view of that the anticipatory bail may kindly be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that there is no fresh ground and earlier on merit argument was made and thereafter anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been withdrawn with liberty to move before the learned court and in that view of the matter the anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. It appears that earlier anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move before the ( 2026:JHHC:18685 ) learned court by way of filing regular bail petition. In course of argument no fresh ground has been argued before this Court to entertain the second anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Dt.25.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-