PUSHPESH AMAN v. THE STATE (N.C. T. OF DELHI) & ANR.
CRL.M.C./5860/2026 · 2026-09-15
Saurabh Banerjee
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18043 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18043 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010369642026 + CRL.M.C. 5860/2026, CRL.M.A. 24457/2026
PUSHPESH AMAN
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suresh Kumar Palta, Adv. alongwith petitioner in person
versus
THE STATE (N.C. T. OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP alongwith respondent in person.
SI Divyanshu, PS Dwarka North.
R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R %
15.09.2026
1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 80067236/2024 dated 25.06.2024 registered at PS.: Dwarka North, Delhi under Sections 380/457 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom as the petitioner and respondent no.2 have mutually settled all their disputes vide Deed of Compromise dated 16.07.2026.
2. Authorization Letter/ Board Authorization Letter handed over by
learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record.
3. Issue notice.
4. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.
5. Respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 11:27:58
6. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioner as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Deed of Compromise dated
16.07.2026. Respondent no.2 hence submits that he does not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners.
7. The petitioner and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been duly identified by the IO.
8. As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility.
9. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No. 80067236/2024 dated 25.06.2024 registered at PS.: Dwarka North, Delhi under Sections 308/457 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
10. As such, the present petition alongwith pending application(s), if any, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2026/vs
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 11:27:58