Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1804 (RAJ)

ANJALI BATHAM W/O SHANU D/O MAAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/456/2026 · 2026-03-27

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13022] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 456/2026 1. Anjali Batham W/o Shanu D/o Maan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur, Presently R/o Taliya Mohalla Dholpur Rajasthan 328001. 2. Shanu S/o Ishvari Prasad, Aged About 30 Years, Talliya Mohalla District Dholpur Rajasthan 328001. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Department Of Home Affairs, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Dholpur Rajasthan. 3. SHO, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 4. Maan Singh S/o Pooran Singh, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur,. 5. Vijendra Batham S/o Pooran Singh, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur,. 6. Pancham Singh S/o Pooran Singh, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur, 7. Gaurav Batham S/o Pancham Singh, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur, 8. Saurav Batham S/o Pancham Singh, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur, 9. Ajay Batham S/o Late Suresh Batham, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur, 10. Udai Batham S/o Vijendra Batham, R/o Purana Khajane Ke Peeche Dhoolkut Dholpur, ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhananjay Jain Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:13022] (2 of 3) [CRLW-456/2026] 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 to 10 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Bapu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan) on 22.01.2026 and same has been registered on 22.01.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submit that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.4 to 10 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur, Rajasthan and respondent no.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:13022] (3 of 3) [CRLW-456/2026] 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /403