SURENDRA SINGH YADAV SON OF SHRI SANWATRAM YADAV v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/9098/2025 · 2026-02-13
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18038 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18038 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7079] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9098/2025 Surendra Singh Yadav Son Of Shri Sanwatram Yadav, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Sarkanpur, Post Mundera, Tehsil Tijara, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahana Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director
2. The Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Tijara Depot, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 13/02/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a grievance that although, he was suffering from problem of slip disk as per medical report, he was advised for doing work of sedentary nature in the office, yet vide impugned order dated 23.05.2025, he was directed to drive the vehicle on road which was dangerous for the petitioner himself as well as for public at large.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the
[2026:RJ-JP:7079] (2 of 2) [CW-9098/2025] petitioner has been posted for discharging office duty vide order dated 10.07.2025.
3.
Order dated 10.07.2025 is taken on record.
4. In view of above, no cause of action for pursuing this writ petition survives and the writ petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/144