[2026:RJ-JP:6223-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 719/2022 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.7294/2021 Ram Charan Meena S/o Shri Raghunath Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Baghpura, Post Chhareda, Tehsil Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Kamar-Ul-Jaman Chaudhary, Public Land Protection Cell Officer/District Collector Dausa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG Mr. S.P. Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/02/2026 1. By means of filing the instant Civil Contempt Petition, disobedience of order dated 15.11.2021 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7294/2021 has been alleged. 2. For ready reference the order dated 15.11.2021 reads as under: “Present petition has been filed with the prayer firstly for removal of encroachment on the Government Gair Mumkin Abadi Land on Khasra No.2833 of Village Bhagpura, Post Chhareda, Tehsil Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa and second to create Public Land Protection Cell in rural areas of the old district of Rajasthan for removal of the encroachment from the public land. [2026:RJ-JP:6223-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-719/2022] Taking judicial note of the fact that PLPC i.e. Public Land Protection Cell has been created in almost all the districts of the State and same are functioning, second prayer of the petitioner as prayed for has already been taken care of by the State of Rajasthan. So far as first prayer of the petitioner is concerned, he may approach the PLPC in view of the judgment passed by this Court in Jagdish Prasad Meena and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (decided on 30.01.2019) and file representation before the PLPC. The same shall be considered and decided by the PLPC within a period of six months from the date of filling of the representation. The private respondents Nos.7 to 9 would also be at liberty to present their case before PLPC and submit all the evidence in support of the same. The authorities shall, after giving opportunity of hearing both to the petitioner and the respondents, decide the matter and if it reaches to the conclusion that encroachments do exist, take appropriate action thereupon. With these observations this petition is disposed of.” 3. In response to the contempt petition, reply has been filed stating inter alia that the encroachment from Khasra No. 2833 (Gair Mumkin Abadi Land) has been removed except the house of Sitaram which was constructed by him after receiving financial assistance under the CMBPL Scheme. 4. In view of reply and compliance report, prima facie, we do not find any disobedience, much less deliberate and willful, of the order dated 15.11.2021 on the part of respondent. 5. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner since long. 6. In such circumstances, the proceedings of present contempt petition are hereby dropped, at this stage. 7. Notices of contempt stand discharged. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/20