Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18031 (RAJ)

MANISH KUMHAR S/O SH. JAMMAN LAL KUMHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/206/2025 · 2026-01-16

Chandra Prakash Shrimali, Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1811-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 206/2025 Manish Kumhar S/o Sh. Jamman Lal Kumhar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 03 Near Johad Kharkhari Kalan, Tehsil Narayanpur District Alwar Hall District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretarait Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Kotputli-Behror District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 4. The Station House Officer Police Station, Narayanpur, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 5. Mukesh Kumar Prajapat S/o Gabduram Prajapat, R/o Neemuchana, Tehsil Bansur District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 6. Banwari Prajapat S/o Sh. Banshiram Prajapat, R/o Neemuchana, Tehsil Bansur District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 7. Himanshu S/o Sh. Mukesh Kumar, R/o Neemuchana, Tehsil Bansur District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 8. Omprakash, R/o Village Mohanpura, Tehsil Bansur District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 9. Deewan, R/o Village Mohanpura, Tehsil Bansur District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 10. Makkhan Kumhar S/o Sh. Matadeen Prajapat, R/o Ward No. 03 Near Johad Kharkhari Kalan, Tehsil Narayanpur District Alwar Hall District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 11. Munshi Prajapat S/o Sh. Matadeen Prajapat, R/o Ward No. 03 Near Johad Kharkhari Kalan, Tehsil Narayanpur District Alwar Hall District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP [2026:RJ-JP:1811-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-206/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 16/01/2026 On last date, i.e., 25.07.2025, following order was passed: “In spite of two pass-overs, no-one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Put up after two weeks.” Today also, none appears for the petitioner even in second round. Defect(s) has not been cured for more than seven months despite availing opportunities. In view thereof, this habeas corpus is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /51