Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18030 (JHR)

RAKESH BIND v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5802/2026 · 2026-06-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18683] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5802 of 2026 ------ Rakesh Bind aged about 38 years son of Rambali Bind, resident of village Sangrahey Khurd, P.O. Sangrahekala, P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-25-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.478 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed the murder of Sushmita Devi. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-19 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Sonu Chaudhary who has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.2803 of 2026 and the petitioner previously told the witnesses that he will take revenge for his son’s death being killed by Sushmita Devi. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-20 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Garhwa in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.478 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-25.06.2026-Animesh/