MOJIBUL RAHMAN ALIAS MOJIBUL SHEKH ALIAS BOLU SHEKH ALIAS MUJIBUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/565/2026 · 2026-06-22
Arun Kumar Rai, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18027 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18027 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:18077-DB p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 565 of 2026 Mojibul Rahman alias Mojibul Shekh alias Bholu Shekh alias Mujibur Rahman, aged about 64 years, son of Late Abdul Mokid, resident of village- Chengadanga, P.O. Chengadanga, P.S. Malpahari (O.P.), District Pakur, Jharkhand, PIN- 816107. …. …. Appellant
Versus State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Respondent
--- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Hon’ble Mr. justice Arun Kumar Rai
For the Appellant: Mr. Anish Lal, Advocate
For the Resp.-State: Spl.P.P. --- 04/ 22.06.2026 Heard Mr. Anish Lal, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl.P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 06.04.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in Misc. Criminal Application No. 106 of 2026, arising out of Pakur (Malpahari) P.S. Case No. 56/2012 whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that from the crusher of Mahubul Sheikh, 47 sacks of 50 Kg. each of Ammonium Nitrate were recovered. 4. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is nowhere connected
2026:JHHC:18077-DB p. 2 with the recovery of Ammonium Nitrate and so far as the letting out of his premises to Mahubul sheikh is concerned, the agreement dated 21.02.2011 has been found to be false as the Notary Public in his statement recorded at Para 44 of the case diary has stated that such agreement was deliberately prepared on back date. 5. It has been submitted that the appellant is in custody since 24.03.2026 and charge has already been framed in the present case. 6. Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. 7. Regard being had to the fact that it was Mahubul Sheikh, who was the person who was instrumental in storing Ammonium Nitrate and the fact that several of the witnesses have stated that the appellant has been framed, which can be deciphered from Para 44 & Para 233 of the case diary, we while setting aside the order dated 06.04.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in Misc.
Criminal Application No. 106 of 2026, arising out of Pakur (Malpahari) P.S. Case No. 56/2012, direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
2026:JHHC:18077-DB p. 3 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in connection with Sessions Trial No.139 of 2025, arising out of Pakur (Malpahari) P.S. Case No. 56 of 2012. 8. This appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
22nd June, 2026
P.K.S./Suman
Uploaded