JAGDISH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CRMMO/803/2026 · 2026-07-30
Rakesh Kainthla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18025 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18025 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 803 of 2026 Date of Decision : 30.07.2026 Jagdish Kumar & Anr. ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioners : Mr. Madan Gopal, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Jitender Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State. Learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 30th July, 2026 (Nikita)