Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
C.W.P No.12941 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.07.2026 _______________________________________________________ Aahi Chand
…….Petitioner
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others
… Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, for respondents-State ___________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired.
3.
Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of .
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge July 30, 2026 (meera)
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?