Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18008 (PNJ)

MOHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/26482/2026 · 2026-05-20

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-26482-2026 -1-                                               Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 15.05.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 20.05.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 20.05.2026 4 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full judgment is pronounced Full 5 The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and reasons thereof Not applicable                                            !    "  !     ###           $         %   !      &'(    )    *  *   +,+( -    .)/0 %      *    ! % !  %  1234'  ,&55+,+5     (,++,5&,&(&26 !    7  8 ! +  $     12      %     PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.20 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26482-2026 -2-    %   !   "    !!            ,(55+,+5  !      %    8 9   %    !        : 7 *     !  ! ; %       *  %      %    !    !  %*        % %     !     !    <   )!!           :       %     !      *       (         12            $   :    ,=55+,+5$     !          !          2     !  &  2    %!    !        %  ! ! !       %     ,=55+,+5$        !   !         ! ,3    ++        %  <   $ : 7 *   %  <  %   % !>       %  !  % !      !    !     !       !          ! +5   6  2 2                % !!  =     !        !       *    PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.20 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26482-2026 -3-          !!  !  !!               %  !  % !$    %      !     <  %   % !$                  % !!  4  $  6        ! %     % !     !       %! !   3  $         :  !!        !         ,(55+,+5>  ++   !,3 %  <   $          ,&  ,4 $ : 7 *       !   %  <  %   % !$       %        $   !             !          !       !   %  /%!   6                         !    %     . Since the trial of this case, apparently and evidently is shown to have been delayed, as such, this Court is of the considered opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody anymore. Accordingly, the petition is allowed, and the petitioner is ordered to be admitted to bail subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned. However, it will be open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail in case the petitioner is found PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.20 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26482-2026 -4- involved in any other subsequent case and if it appears that it is on account of any act and conduct of the petitioner that further delay is being caused in the conclusion of the trial and further subject to his abiding by the following conditions:- - 0$he petitioner will not tamper with evidence during trial. - 0  !!  %     !6       < !   <  %        6  - 0    !!  !   !*              ;                 !     6   !    - 0   !!   !    !  %      %    '  2     !   %            conditions, the respondent-State shall be at liberty to move an application seeking cancellation of the bail. 9. It is made clear that any observation made herein above is only for the purpose of deciding the present petition and the same shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.        ! "           #$%&                             PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.20 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document