1 2026:CGHC:10547 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 641 of 2026 Pankaj Dahariya S/o Amit Dahariya Aged About 20 Years R/o Bhagat Singh Ward Bhatapara, P.S. Bhatapara, Gramin District- Baloda, Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Bhatapara Gramin, District – Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Petitioners : Mr. Vijay Shankar Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Saumya Rai, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 28.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. Vijay Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Saumya Rai, Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent/State. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the bail application MCRC No. 1850 of 2026 was moved on behalf of the applicant namely, Pankaj Dahariya, and the same was allowed by this Court on 23.02.2026, but as in the cause title and para No.3 of said bail application the counsel for the petitioner wrongly wrote offence as only “Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act”, therefore, the offence in para 2 and 9 of the order dated 23.02.2026, in stead of transcribing ‘Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 Act and Section 111 of BNS’, only ‘Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act’ has been transcribed. It is further submitted that in the bail rejection order, the offence under Section 111 of BNS is mentioned and the bail application of the applicant was also rejected with respect to said offence, but inadvertently, he could not mention the same in the bail application, hence, the offence as ‘Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act and Section 111 of BNS’ should be transcribed in place of only ‘Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act’ in para 2 and 9 of the order dated 23.02.2026. 3. From perusal of the order sought to be modified, it appears that there are certain mistakes crept in para 2 and 9 of the said order, which needs to be modified, hence, the offence mentioned as only ‘Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act’ in para 2 and 9 of the order dated 23.02.2026 passed in MCRC No. 1850 of 2026, be modified and read as ‘Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act and Section 111 of BNS’. 4. With the aforesaid modification, the instant CRMP is hereby Allowed. 5. A copy of this order be placed along with the records of MCRC No. 1850 of 2026. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar