SHAILESH KUMAR RAI @ MINTU RAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRR/1161/2022 · 2026-02-27
Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18007 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18007 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:10589
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1161 of 2022 Shailesh Kumar Rai @ Mintu Rai S/o Late Paramhansh Rai Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Sherpurkala, Bhanwarkol, District Gajipur (U. P.)
... Petitioner versus 1 – State of Chhattisgarh through Station House Officer, Police Station Baradwar, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Natwar Lal Agrawal S/o Late Harchand Lal Agrawal Aged About 62 Years R/o Baradwar, Tahsil Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For the Petitioner : None For the State/R-1 : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Government Advocate For respondent no.2 : None for respondent no.2. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
Order on Board 28.02.2026 By this revision filed under section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner seeks a direction to set aside the
order dated 19.10.2022 passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (C.G) in Sessions Trial No.39/2019 ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Digitally signed by ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Date: 2026.02.28 17:04:20 +0530
2 whereby the application filed by the petitioner u/s 319 of CrPC for impleading respondent no.2 as an accused has been dismissed. No one appears for the petitioner when the matter is called even in third round. Mr. Vinod Tekam, Govt. Advocate, appears on behalf of the State/ Respondent no.1. None for respondent no.2. Since no one appears to argue the case on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao