Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18003 (AP)

D.Yeswanth Nath v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5952/2026 · 2026-03-06

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010100782026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5952/2026 Between: 1. D.YESWANTH NATH, S/O D. SHIVA BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR, H.NO 28-1050-A-4-2, VIDYA NAGAR, SAI BABA NAGAR, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518523 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (POLITICAL), GENERAL ADMINISTRATIONS (PROTOCOL.B) DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522238 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRANSPORT ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT A P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 522238 4. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NANDYAL , NANDYAL DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518523 5. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518523 2 BKM,J W.P.No.5952 of 2026 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (RAND B) DEVISION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518523 7. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RAND B SUB DEVISION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518523 8. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (RAND B) NORTH SECTION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518523 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH N Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR TRANSPORT 3 BKM,J W.P.No.5952 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. However, liberty is given to file afresh in accordance with law if so warranted and if so advised. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 07.03.2026 PGT