APHC010102102026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5847/2026 Between: 1. KANAKAMMA, W/O. LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KANGUNDHI VILLAGE AND POST KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517001 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KUPPAM POLICE STATION KUPPAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, KUPPAM POLICE STATION KUPPAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 6. THE TAHSILDAR, KUPPAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 7. CHAN BASHA, S/O LATE MOHAMED SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O. MG PHOTO STUDIO, 0PP.POLICE STATION, NETHAJI ROAD, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 517425 8. M GHOUSE, S/O LATE MOHAMED SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O. MG PHOTO STUDIO, 0PP.POLICE STATION, 2 NETHAJI ROAD, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 517425 9. NASRIN, W/O LATE SAJATHA SAB AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE 10. SUMAYA, D/O LATE SAJATHA SAB AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC - EMPLOYEE 11. SHABUDDIN, S/O LATE SAJATHA SAB AGED ABOUT 33YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE THE RESPONDENTS 9 TO 11 ARE RESIDENTS OF KANGUNDHI VILLAGE AND POST KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: <…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondents No.4 to 6 in interfering with petitioner personal life and liberty by calling the petitioner to their offices and pressurizing the petitioner to get settled the disputes with the respondents No.7 to 11 with regard to subject property of O.S. No. 44 of 2018 on the file of the Civil Judge(Junior Division) Kuppam, by handing over the House site of the suit scheduled property as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.4 to 6 not to interfere with petitioner personal life and liberty by calling the petitioner to their offices…= 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Respondents No.4 to 6 are interfering with the Petitioner’s personal life and liberty by pressurizing 3 the Petitioner to settle the civil dispute in O.S.No.44 of 2018 pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kuppam. 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that, Respondent No.8 had orally complained to Respondents No.4 and 5, who in turn advised him to pursue the matter before the learned Civil Court. It is further submitted that the Respondents No.4 and 5 did not summon or call the Petitioner in connection with the said civil dispute. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 not to interfere further in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 02.03.2026 PRA 4 31 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5847 of 2026 Date: 02.03.2026 PRA