Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17998 (JHR)

RAMEEJ RAJ ALIAS RAMIJ RAJ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5803/2026 · 2026-06-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18686] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5803 of 2026 ------ Rameej Raj @ Ramij Raj aged about 28 Years S/O Abdul Gani, Resident of Village: Gadha Toli, Kokar, Post Office & Police Station: Sadar, District: Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate Ms. Rashika Bhardwaj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-25-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.91 of 2026 (N) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111 (2) (b), 111 (3), 111 (4) B.N.S., 2023 and Section 21 (b), 22 (b) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 3 gm of Brown Sugar which is also known as Heroin and from the possession of the co-accused persons, altogether 6.4 gm of Brown Sugar was recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the totally seized Brown Sugar comes under intermediate quantity while the individually seized Brown Sugar from the petitioner comes under small quantity. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 15.05.2026 passed in B.A. No.4168 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge, NDPS, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.91 of 2026 (N)with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-25.06.2026-Animesh/