1 APHC010100342016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 684/2016 Between: 1. K.KARUNAMANI, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST., W/O. RAMANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, ANGANWADI WORKER (REMOVED), GURRAJUPETA -I VILLAGE, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. YUVARAJ I A S VISAKHAPATNAM 2 OTHERS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM 2. SMT VIJAYA LAKSHMI, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. SMT G SHARADA DEVI, I.C.D.S. PROJECT OFFICER, NAKKAPALLI, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for willfully, intentionally flouting the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.M.P. No. 48440 of 2015 in WP. No. 37661 of 2015 dated 04.12.2015 and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(APPL 3466 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2016(APPL 3497 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 3 OF 2016(APPL 3737 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 684/2016 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 04.12.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.48440 of 2015 in W.P. No.37661 of 2015. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It is also brought to the notice of this Court by the respondents that the main writ petition has been allowed by setting aside the impugned Proceedings No.8, dated 13.05.2015 issued by respondent No. 4, and the matter has been remanded to the said respondent for fresh consideration. 3. In view of the allowing of the main Writ Petition, the present Contempt Case is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue her remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 18.02.2026 S D P 4 134 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 684/2016 18.02.2026 W S D P